 |
This is a “Case Study” article written by Dr. Kraemer documenting a
case involving one of our dear clients and her beloved pet.
This case study was published in the November 2004 issue.
“Kitty’s” owner was not aware that feeding commercial canned Tuna
as a sole diet can lead to serious neurological disease due to vitamin
deficiency.
Fortunately with LOVE & CARE we were able nurse Kitty back to good
health and called the owner with the good news. |
2004 Article
Earlier this year, “Kitty”, a 10-year-old spayed female cat was
brought to Dr. R. Kraemer at Grand pet Care Center Animal Hospital for sudden lethargy. Kitty was an indoor cat with no history of
medical problems. The owner was not aware of any vomiting,
diarrhea, coughing, sneezing, excessive drinking, or urination.
When asked about Kitty's diet, she informed me that Kitty received
canned tuna primarily, and a commercial diet occasionally. Upon
physical examination, I noticed obvious neurological abnormalities in
varying degrees: ataxia and falling, ventroflexion of the head,
opisthotonos, persistent rigid extensor tonus of the hind legs, and
dilated pupils. Radiographs revealed fecal material in the colon
and radiopaque material in the stomach. A serum chemistry
profile revealed elevated alanine transaminase activity (465 IU/L), an
elevated total bilirubin concentration (1.6 mg/dl; direct=0.6 mg/dl,
indirect =1 mg/dl), and a decreased blood urea nitrogen concentration
(13 mg/dl). We started treatment with intravenous fluids and
antibiotics. I had never seen vitamin B deficiency, but the tuna
fish diet confession triggered some memories from veterinary school.
For confirmation, I called the local neurologist who recommended
giving 100 mg thiamine intramuscularly twice a day, place a
nasogastric feeding tube, and provided nutritional support. The
owner, a senior on a limited income but genuinely committed and
loving, agreed to extend Kitty's hospitalization based on the
estimated three days of vitamin B injections. I noted no
improvement. The owner could not afford further treatment and opted to
euthanize Kitty, but when I offered to assume additional costs, she
consented to continue the treatment. On Day 8, Kitty was eating
on her own and showed moderate neurological improvement. By Day
11, Kitty had fully recovered, and we released her to her owner. The
appreciative owner promised to keep Kitty on a proper premium feline
diet. Occasionally, the seemingly uncommon conditions we memorized for
veterinary school exams do materialize.
This case also illustrates why basic dietary client education is vital
and it's a classic example of why case history is one of those truly
rewarding cases in which allowing the good Samaritan exception pays
off.
|